So far, I have been talking about servos largely from the perspective of their typical use. While I hope I have provided a decent foundation about their intended use and some idea of what is inside a servo, these are things you could learn from hobby stores and taking apart a few servos. Today, I want to move on to a discussion of the electrical characteristics of servos, with the control interface as the primary topic. From the servo manufacturers’ perspective, the control signal can be an internal detail, so discussing it means we are moving on to a realm that is less officially documented. I will try to keep things general and back up my claims a bit where practical, but some details might not apply to all servos.
First, a review of the electrical connections that I mentioned in the inside servos post. If you just read that, you can jump ahead to the “power” section.
Servos have three-wire cables that supply power and commands to servos. The cables are typically six to twelve inches long, with 22 gauge and thinner wires (smaller servos tend to have shorter and thinner wires). Since the connectors have become more standardized, the order of the wires has also become standardized, with the power wire in the middle flanked by ground and signal wires. However, the color schemes still vary. Common ones are:
My preference is for the first scheme since that offers the most contrast; the orange and brown of the second scheme can look kind of similar with bad lighting, as can the blue and black of the third approach. You are almost guaranteed to instantly destroy a servo if you connect power backwards, so make sure you double-check your connections.
The three-conductor cable is terminated with a 3-pin connector, which is almost universally a female connector with 0.1" spacing. Unfortunately, much of the RC world calls this female connector a male connector. As with the cable colors, the connector colors can vary. The “Futaba” plug, on the left in the picture below, has an extra polarizing tab (on the left side in the picture) that can be cut off to match the others, which are called “JR” (center) and “Airtronics Z” (right). Some of the brand names might vary by country; the most common names I see from generic servo makers in China are “Futaba” and “JR”.
Viewed from the end, the connectors have two beveled corners to help prevent plugging servos in backwards. That prevention mechanism relies on the RC receiver having a corresponding cutout, which is not present on most servo controllers and other electronics a robot builder might be using instead of the usual radio control components. Again: pay attention when plugging in your servos!
As I mentioned in the introduction to servos, servos are typically used in battery-powered applications. The batteries were historically four- or five-cell NiCd packs or four-cell alkaline packs, which yield nominal voltages of 4.8-6.0 V. Newer NiMH packs have the same voltages, and so servos tend to be designed for operation at those voltages but without specification of the exact operating range. A well-charged 5-cell pack can reach about 7.0 V, and a 4-cell pack can drop to about 4.0 V without being considered ridiculously discharged, so that is the range over which we can reasonably expect most servos to operate.
Going to higher voltages can destroy servos, so testing the upper boundary can be risky. On the other hand, lower voltages correspond to drained batteries that we hope would not lead to damaged servos, so you can safely test the lower end of the operating range with a variable power supply. If you do tests for the low end, keep in mind that individual units can vary and that the limit might be a function of variables such as the temperature.
Some servos, especially micro servos, are rated only for 4.8 V operation, which implies 4-cell operation with a maximum voltage of 6.0 V. As the RC industry embraced lithium-based rechargeable batteries, some servos intended for operation from one cell (3.7 V nominal) and from two cells in series (7.4 V nominal) emerged. The single-cell units are again on the micro side, and can have upper limits of around 4.5 V; the two-cell units might be marketed as high-voltage servos since the upper voltage limit is 9 V or higher. A three-cell nickel-based pack can generally replace a single-cell lithium battery, and a six-cell nickel pack can replace a two-cell lithium pack.
The current required by servos also tends to be unspecified. When we design with servos, as with most components, there are two main currents we care about: the quiescent or idle current, when the servo is not doing anything, and the maximum current, which in the case of a servo is the stall current. The quiescent current will give us an upper bound on how long a battery-powered application can run; the stall current tells us the minimum current our power supply has to be capable of delivering. The average current a servo consumes in actual operation will be somewhere between the two extremes and will depend on how active the servo is in the application.
The current a servo draws will be approximately linear with the supply voltage, so the currents drawn at 7 V will be almost double those at 4 V. It’s relatively easy to measure the quiescent current since it is low, constant, and flows in a low-strain scenario. Stall currents are more difficult to measure because actually stalling a servo is not that desirable, so we do not want to do it for a prolonged period. If you need to know the stall current, it’s safest to measure at the low end of the operating range and then extrapolate for higher supply voltages.
Since servo currents usually are not specified and we might not want to bother measuring each servo we use, it’s good to keep a few estimates in mind. A standard servo will have a stall current around one amp, a micro servo will need a few hundred milliamps, and a giant servo can draw ten amps or more. Since servos run at basically the same voltages, the only ways servos can offer more torque is to have higher gear ratios or to use more current. If two servos have similar speeds at the same voltage but one has five times the stall torque, it will likely draw five times the stall current.
The quiescent currents are tricker to estimate because they are not dominated by the motor the way stall currents are. There can be substantial variation in these idle currents since they depend on the electronics in the servo, but typically, the current should be in the few dozen to one or two hundred milliamp range. The quiescent current can also be complicated by the existence of two possible values: one for the case where the servo is trying to maintain a position but is already there and therefore doesn’t need to power the motor, and another for the case where the servo is “off” and not trying to maintain a position at all. (We’ll get to what it means for the servo to be “off” later.)
Servo control interface
Servos are controlled by pulses on the signal line that are referenced to the ground line, which is the return path both for servo power and the control signal. The pulse frequency is typically 50 Hz, but the exact frequency does not matter. The pulse width corresponds to the position of the servo, with 1.5 ms corresponding to the servo’s “neutral” point. This neutral point is not necessarily the midpoint of the servo’s maximum available range. Making the pulse shorter makes the servo go one way; making the pulse longer makes the servo go the other way. The normal pulse width range is 1.0 ms to 2.0 ms, which corresponds to an approximate mechanical range of 90 degrees (for most servos).
Since the servo interface is not that explicitly documented, let’s look at the signals from a typical RC receiver on an oscilloscope. We’ll begin by looking at this low-end, 2-channel AM receiver:
The following screen shot shows the signals for the two channels over a 100 ms period. I powered the receiver with a 5-cell battery that should have been somewhere around 6 V, but we see the output pulses are regulated to about four volts:
At this horizontal time scale, we can see that the pulse frequency is actually very slightly higher than 50 Hz. We also see that a 1.5 ms pulse represents less than 10% duty cycle, so we have to zoom in in time to better see the actual pulses:
In the left picture, both channels are at around 1.5 ms since I had the control inputs on the RC transmitter at their neutral positions. In the right capture, I’ve moved the control inputs to their extremes, causing the channel one pulse width to get to almost 2 ms and the channel two pulse width to shrink to about 1 ms.
Next up, let’s look at the outputs from this higher-end, six channel receiver:
We’ll start again with the same 100 ms horizontal scale, which shows that the pulse frequency from this receiver is a bit higher than from the previous receiver:
It’s difficult to notice since I had to change the vertical scale to fit four channels, but the pulse amplitude is now down to just 3 V. If we zoom in in time, we can also clearly see that the pulses are getting sent out one after another:
The relative timing of the pulses on various channels does not matter to individual servos since each servo only gets one signal, but it does give us something to think about if we want to generate the pulses to control multiple servos: if we want to send more then ten pulses that can be up to 2 ms long in 20 ms or less, we will have to keep track of multiple simultaneous pulses. I looked at another RC receiver (an 8-channel Airtronics 92824) hoping it would have overlapping pulses, but the outputs looked the same as those from the Futaba receiver (including the 3.0 V pulse voltage).
Conclusion (for now)
At this point, you should have some idea about the power and signal you need to apply to a servo to get it to move. Next time, we’ll look at servos and their command interface in more detail to see what happens as we try to get more performance out of them.